Prediction of Kyle Kang [695th] vs Alexander Kotzen [888th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L W L W L
Form
L W L W W L L W W LH2H: Kang 1 - 0 Kotzen
They have played 3 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Kotzen winning 1. The last match between Kang and Kotzen was at the M25 Southaven, 09-08-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Kyle Kang getting the victory 3-6 6-0 4-0 ret..
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kyle Kang | 1 |
| Alexander Kotzen | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. |
Stats 
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:39:0 | Average Match Time | 1:39:0 |
| 78% (38/49) | 1st Serve % | 69% (47/68) |
| 76% (29/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (27/47) |
| 55% (6/11) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (8/21) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 49% (33/68) | Return Points Win % | 29% (14/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kyle Kang vs Alexander Kotzen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kang 1 - 0 Kotzen
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kang has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kotzen has won 53.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kang, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kotzen has won 34.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 16.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kang has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kotzen has saved 76.92% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kang has won 62.07% of matches played (W/L 18/ 11), with Kotzen winning 62.5% (W/L 15/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 21/ 13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Kotzen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 84/ 49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 9/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Kang has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64% of matches (W/L 16/ 9), where as Kotzen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.9% of matches (W/L 13/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kang winning 1 times and Kotzen being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kang winning 2 and Kotzen winning 1. The last match between Kang and Kotzen was at the M25 Southaven, 09-08-2024, Quarterfinals, Hard with Kyle Kang getting the victory 3-6 6-0 4-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kang and Kotzen have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kang winning 0 times and Kotzen 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kang winning 0, and Kotzen 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kang has played against opponents with an average rank of 118.31 while Kotzen has played against players with an average rank of 92.17.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kang has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kotzen has won 17% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kang has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kotzen has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Kyle Kang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Trey Hilderbrand
Player
Kyle Kang
55%
(
65 of
118)
1st Serve %
50%
(
60 of
121)
13
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
9
77%
(
50 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
58%
(
31 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
37 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
43 of
121)
124
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(9) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
54 of
80)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
80
|
0-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Kyle Kang
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Kiranpal Pannu
60%
(
73 of
121)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
121)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
78)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
121)
127
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Tyler Zink
Player
Kyle Kang
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
47%
(
21 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Juan Carlos Prado Angelo
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
47 of
72)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
83
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Ryan Fishback
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
78%
(
57 of
73)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Gavin Young
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Colin Sinclair
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 6-7(4) 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Alexander Kotzen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Kypson
Player
Alexander Kotzen
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
51%
(
50 of
98)
18
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
73%
(
22 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
20 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Naoki Nakagawa
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
3
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
30 of
36)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
19 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Aidan Mchugh
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
93)
13
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
48 of
62)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
24 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
93)
87
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Corwin
Player
Alexander Kotzen
42%
(
32 of
77)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
7
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
49%
(
22 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
86
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyle Kang
Player
Alexander Kotzen
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
47 of
68)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
3-6 6-0 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Adit Sinha
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Keshav Chopra
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Cleeve Harper
Player
Alexander Kotzen
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Alexander Kotzen
63%
(
52 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
65 of
89)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
42 of
52)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Kang vs Kotzen?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Kang Vs Kotzen is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54% (61/51) | Win/Loss | 62% (103/64) |
| 53% (136/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (230/150) |
| 51% (1263/1206) | Games Win/Loss | 55% (1956/1604) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 233 | Aces Total | 396 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 188 | Total Double Faults | 205 |
| 1:38:11 | Average Match Time | 1:5:44 |
| 212.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 149.65 |
| 59% (4145/7027) | 1st Serve % | 62% (4307/6970) |
| 66% (2756/4145) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (2986/4307) |
| 51% (1478/2882) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1398/2663) |
| 41% (295/720) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (281/629) |
| 41% (2840/7002) | Return Points Win % | 39% (2684/6858) |
| 54% (58/108) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (101/163) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 48% (16/33) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (23/48) |
| 53% (16/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (22/46) |
| 86% (56/48) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (100/89) |
| 14% (56/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (100/11) |
| 23% (56/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (67/14) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
